PREFACE

A few years ago John mentioned to his alleged CIA buddy the possible scenario of law enforcement malfeasance regarding mass NSA surveillance which allows law enforcement to essentially pre-empt internal investigations -- therefore in a very large sense allowing "the fox to guard the henhouse" so to speak. On August 4th, 2015 John filed his first Amended Complaint with the Superior Court of California; County of Santa Clara -- Sunnyvale Courthouse (Note: John never received the required reciprocal documentation from this court; and perhaps due to this seemingly intentional oversight -- the ex-presiding Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge in charge was later replaced by Judge Rose Pichon). After John turned onto the El Camino Real from Henderson Avenue and waited at the stop light at Poplar Avenue heading towards downtown Sunnyvale; a Sunnyvale DPS vehicle then turned onto El Camino Real from Poplar Avenue WITH HIS LIGHTS FLASHING (!?!) traveling in front (!?!) of John's vehicle all the way up to Wolfe Road.

John was either getting an official escort to the Sunnyvale City Clerks' office and/or this was a lame attempt at intimidating and/or coercing John; who suspects keystroke monitors were perhaps being utilized to track Johns' movements and progress on the Amended Complaint. Adding to this; a cadre of Sunnyvale Police Officers and/or Firemen were waiting in front of the Sunnyvale City Clerks' office in a highly unsuccessful intimidation attempt. Adding to this; at the federal level there was a lone wolf terrorist alert announced on this very same day; suggesting an element of collusion was perhaps involved in this particular incident at the federal level.

NSA SURVEILLANCE MALFEASANCE + 18 U.S. CODE § 245 - FEDERALLY PROTECTED ACTIVITIES + 18 U.S. CODE § 1512 - TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS; VICTIM OR INFORMANT ETC

http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/08/nsa-surveillance-malfeasance-18-us-code.html

18 U.S. Code § 245 - Federally protected activities -- (b) Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, by force or threat of force willfully injures, intimidates or interferes with, or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with (1) any person because he is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or any other person or any class of persons from — (A) voting or qualifying to vote, qualifying or campaigning as a candidate for elective office, or qualifying or acting as a poll watcher, or any legally authorized election official, in any primary, special, or general election; (B) participating in or enjoying any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States; (D) serving, or attending upon any court in connection with possible service, as a grand or petit juror in any court of the United States; (E) participating in or enjoying the benefits of any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. > GO TO: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/245

<><><>

INCIDENT ON 7 SEP 2016 / ALLEGED STRONG ARMED ROBBERY ON THUNDERBIRD AVENUE

http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/09/incident-on-7-sep-2016-alleged-strong.html

On 7 September 2016 a Sunnyvale DPS Officer appeared at Johns' front door following up on a complaint about an alleged strong armed robbery that occurred on Thunderbird Avenue in Sunnyvale at around 6:30 PM that evening. The Officer asked John if he could access his surveillance footage for clues; to which John agreed. John initially accidentally pulled up footage from the wrong day; then returned with the correct footage on a thumb drive storage unit. The Officers were very friendly and professional; thanking John for his efforts -- then eventually left the scene.

But this brings up an obvious question: Why didn't Officers Smith and Ochoa pull up surveillance footage from the Oasis Nightclub back in 2012 when KJ Doug attacked John? Why are all people not being treated equally by Sunnyvale DPS etc? And why did the Sunnyvale DPS "C.S.I." Officer not return Johns' thumb drive as suggested?

Adding to this; John called the Sunnyvale DPS non-emergency line the week of the 2012 Oasis Nightclub attack by Doug Ward; and was promised by a female phone attendant that responding Officers would pull up footage of the attack at the Oasis Nightclub the next week if John was kept from singing. John requested now retired Officer Jim Carrell; but got Officers Smith and Ochoa instead who then violated Johns' civil rights by ordering John to leave the club after refusing to pull up video footage of the attack by Doug Ward. (Note: ex-Officer Jim Carrell is now retired).

Question: Why did Sunnyvale DPS officers responding to the 7 September 2016 strong armed robbery incident ask John to provide surveillance footage of this incident; while Officers Smith and Ochoa refused in 2012 at the Oasis Nightclub? (see: discrimination)

GO TO: OFFICER JIM CARRELL AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/05/officer-jim-carrells-prior-knowledge.html

+ OFFICERS SMITH AND OCHOA

http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/04/officers-smith-and-ochoa.html

IN RETROSPECT: John's encounter with Officers Smith and Ochoa on 20 April 2012 at the Oasis Nightclub was just one incident in a long chain of negligent encounters with the Sunnyvale DPS; a negligent pattern of behavior that must change. And this may have something to do with the double-duty between police work and firefighting that occurs here in Sunnyvale; as it is nearly impossible to be equally as good at two separate professions. Because it is easier to urinate and/or hold a fire hose than it is to be a good police officer.

Note: Adding insult to injury; Sunnyvale DPS Officers Fuji and Gantt took TWO MONTHS until February 25th to respond to this incident; where Officer Fuji suggested it was an 'accident'; even though the surveillance footage clearly shows this is not the case. Adding to this; the Veterinarian questioned by Fuji and Gantt did not even view the surveillance footage in question.

GO TO: NEXTDOOR.COM: PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION / DISCRIMINATION ETC http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/07/nextdoorcom-private-business-of-public.html

+ SEE ALSO: ALL RELEVANT EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/02/surveillance-footage-all-relevant.html

Note: Officers Smith and Ochoa failed to provide John with the required incident number for this event.; and Sunnyvale DPS has repeatedly refused to protect and serve John as required by law.

GO TO: THANKS FOR NOTHING / PART II -- MOTION FOR EXPUNGEMENT AND/OR FACTUAL INNOCENCE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/06/thanks-for-nothing-part-ii-motion-for.html

<><><>

On June 18th, 2016 John walked into the Oasis Nightclub in Sunnyvale, California; sat down and filled out a karaoke slip and gave it to KJ Joe Soria; who was there that night. The bartender then called out to Joe from across the room saying: "the guy in the red hat has to leave" (in other words; John) and this unlawful order was given by Oasis Nightclub owner Jerry Grimes.

But if a nightclub does not charge an entry fee; then it goes without saying that anybody and everybody of legal age can enter without financial obligation and/or discrimination. This has always been the unspoken law of rock n roll; and remains the unspoken law of the land.

Adding to this; Sunnyvale DPS did nothing to protect Johns' civil rights and/or enforce California law regarding arbitrary ejections from private businesses of public accommodation; and the State of California's lax and/or lack of enforcement of applicable laws has facilitated this discrimination.

The bottom line: If Officers Smith and Ochoa had just done their jobs to begin with back in 2012; none of this would have happened. This latest June 2016 incident is but an extension of the negligence and/or discrimination etc that John has experienced from Sunnyvale DPS.

GO TO: INCIDENT ON 18 JUNE 2016 / THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB IN SUNNYVALE,

CALIFORNIA = PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/incident-on-18-june-2016-oasis.html

<><><>

THE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION = FREEDOM OF SPEECH @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-first-amendment-of-united-states.html

On 20 September 2016 John noticed a Birdland Free Press (BFP) flyer that he had posted on a street light pole was gone again. The Birdland Free Press is a publication that was created to find the person who caused "Missy Cat" to be put to sleep after her back was broken on Christmas Day 2015. The flyers had been disappearing for a few days; and John noticed on 19 September 2016 that Mister Olenak (and sometimes his wife and daughter) were repeatedly obstructing justice and/or obstructing the investigation into Missy Cats' death by taking the flyers down.

Mister Olenak had previously admitted to attacking John at a "mob style" (if you will) sit down trial/administrative hearing with Judge Louis Amadeo Junior; and for some reason Mister Olenak not arrested on the spot for this admission of guilt; and the rest of his family was not charged with conspiracy either as they obviously should have been -- so John proceeded to write about it in his Addendum Blog like every good American should; perhaps angering the Olenak family.

Adding insult to injury; Johns' cat Buster had been acting out of sorts at the time -- leading John to believe that Buster was sick. So John and his father took Buster to the local VCA hospital to have him checked out. Busters' condition had been rapidly declining over the last week; and Johns' father was not convinced that Buster was sick until 20 September 2016.

Buster was in critical condition at this point and needed emergency care; which he eventually got on that same day. The Veterinarian recommended largely unaffordable multi-day emergency overnight care for Buster; or euthanasia -- which was an unacceptable choice to John as Buster had been very healthy just a week before this. Blood testing showed that Buster had problems with his Kidneys; but it did not specify what caused the problems. John suspects that Buster could have possibly been poisoned; but no toxicology tests were performed.

A supposed "Social Worker"who happened to be at the VCA hospital at the time then slandered John by falsely accusing John of injuring his fathers' right hand (!?!) as Johns' Father had previously broke his arm taking a suitcase out of his car a few weeks before this causing an infection from a badly formed Kaiser Permanente cast that cut into his hand. And this same "Social Worker" told John this incident "would be added to his file". What file!?!

ACTUAL FRAUD consists in any of the following acts, committed by a party to the contract, or with his connivance, with intent to deceive another party thereto, or to induce him to enter into the contract: 1) The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true; 2) The positive assertion, in a manner not warranted by the information of the person making it, of that which is not true, though he believes it to be true; 3) The suppression of that which is true, by one having knowledge or belief of the fact; 4) A promise made without any intention of performing it; or, 5) Any other act fitted to deceive.

> GO TO: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=civgrup=01001-02000&file=1565-1590

+ SEE ALSO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/09/18-us-code-fraud-and-false-statements.html

Note: Johns' sister Kris stood by; Kris should have took the suitcase out of the vehicle – and Kris was also the individual who "got the ball rolling" and/or "set John up" by making false statements and/or slanderous statements about John to Sunnyvale DPS.

GO TO: KRIS CLEFSTAD: INCIDENT #EV 15118 237 | VANDALISM + PROPERTY THEFT ETC @

http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/04/kris-clefstad-incident-ev-15118-237.html

An obvious example of intentional infliction of emotional distress; and/or since men are generally not allowed the same emotional freedom as women – this same supposed social worker totally ignored the fact that Buster Cat had just gotten a fatal diagnosis; and instead focused upon Johns' normal emotional response – largely due to lack of money to take care of Buster Cat after filing numerous claim forms over the years with valid complaints about various questionable incidents.

Do you all need to be reminded once again that John experienced a multi-year siege that used up all of Johns' life insurance monies left to him by his brother Carl; leaving John broke and in debt for the first time in Johns' life after maintaining a spotless credit record for over 20 years?

GO TO: REST IN PEACE BROTHER CARL @

http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/06/rest-in-peace-brother-carl_24.html

And why did Officer Mathers ask John about his finances when John has literally taken the last 5 years to explain in this Addendum Blog about the multifarious criminal malfeasance he has experienced (police-sponsored conspiratorial stalking; harassment; violent attacks; pets maimed and/or killed; property vandalized etc etc etc) and the resultant draining effect upon his finances?

Note: Sunnyvale DPS responded to this slanderous social workers' complaint once more and actually helped John on 1 October 2016 when they "squashed it" after speaking to John and/or Johns' Father once again. These responding Officers were very kind and professional; and the Officer who did most of the talking was exceptional -- the kind of person who should end up as Police Chief.

But the fact remains that Sunnyvale DPS never took equal actions to question Johns' various attackers and stalkers etc over the last decade or so; so why are they questioning John now? And why did they choose to question John the same day John found out his cat Buster may be dying; then again on the same day Buster died -- adding insult to injury? Was this some sort of vile abuse of NSA surveillance; or was it just a case of bad timing?

Or did it have something to do with 'blow back' from the Matthew Beninger issue which was looming in the background at the time without John's knowledge; with Mister Beningers' son chiming in on Johns' Occupy Sunnyvale site about his crooked ex-cop Father?

Note: Sunnyvale DPS retained a new Police Chief shortly after this event.

GO TO: REST IN PEACE BUSTER CAT @

http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/10/rest-in-peace-buster-cat.html

+ SEE ALSO: EX-SUNNYVALE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (DPS) OFFICER MATTHEW BENINGER & SON ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/10/ex-police-officer-matthew-beninger.html

Adding to this: Officer Mathers had one last chance to apprehend Jake Paolinetti on 15 June 2013; as two Sunnyvale Police Officers (Officers Holt and Mathers) responded to a call John made to the Sunnyvale Police Department regarding this link:

INCIDENT ON 15 JUNE 2013 / EV13-166-206 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/06/incident-on-15-june-2013-ev13-166-206_17.html

This was the last documented incident of non-coincidental/conspiratorial stalking and/or harassment. As usual for the Sunnyvale DPS; Mathers took no action to finally arrest Jake Paolinetti and his conspiratorial friends on this day for their illegal multi-year siege.

<><><>

Adding to this; John called the Sunnyvale DPS non-emergency line the week of the 2012 Oasis Nightclub attack by Doug Ward; and was promised by a female phone attendant that responding Officers would pull up footage of the attack at the Oasis Nightclub the next week if John was kept from singing. John requested now retired Officer Jim Carrell; but got Officers Smith and Ochoa instead who then violated Johns' civil rights by ordering John to leave the club after refusing to pull up video footage of the attack by Doug Ward. (Note: ex-Officer Jim Carrell is now retired).

Question: Why did Sunnyvale DPS officers responding to the 7 September 2016 strong armed robbery incident ask John to provide surveillance footage of this incident; while Officers Smith and Ochoa refused in 2012 at the Oasis Nightclub? (See: discrimination)

GO TO: OFFICER JIM CARRELL AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/05/officer-jim-carrells-prior-knowledge.html

+ OFFICERS SMITH AND OCHOA

http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/04/officers-smith-and-ochoa.html

IN RETROSPECT: John's encounter with Officers Smith and Ochoa on 20 April 2012 at the Oasis Nightclub was just one incident in a long chain of negligent encounters with the Sunnyvale DPS; a negligent pattern of behavior that must change. And this may have something to do with the double-duty between police work and firefighting that occurs here in Sunnyvale; as it is nearly impossible to be equally as good at two separate professions. Because it is easier to urinate and/or hold a fire hose than it is to be a good police officer.

GO TO: ALL RELEVANT EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/02/surveillance-footage-all-relevant.html

Note: Officers Smith and Ochoa failed to provide John with the required incident number for this event.

+ SEE ALSO: THANKS FOR NOTHING / PART II -- MOTION FOR EXPUNGEMENT AND/OR FACTUAL INNOCENCE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/06/thanks-for-nothing-part-ii-motion-for.html

<><><>

INCIDENT ON 18 JUNE 2016 / THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB IN SUNNYVALE,

CALIFORNIA = PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/incident-on-18-june-2016-oasis.html

On June 18th, 2016 John walked into the Oasis Nightclub in Sunnyvale, California; sat down and filled out a karaoke slip and gave it to KJ Joe Soria; who was there that night. The bartender then called out to Joe from across the room saying: "the guy in the red hat has to leave" (in other words; John) and this unlawful order was given by Oasis Nightclub owner Jerry Grimes.

But if a nightclub does not charge an entry fee; then it goes without saying that anybody and everybody of legal age can enter without financial obligation and/or discrimination. This has always been the unspoken law of rock n roll; and remains the unspoken law of the land.

Adding to this; Sunnyvale DPS did nothing to protect Johns' civil rights and/or enforce California law regarding arbitrary ejections from private businesses of public accommodation; and the State of California's lax and/or lack of enforcement of applicable laws has facilitated this discrimination.

In fact; one of the desk officers not only did nothing to help John; but also was very rude and threatening towards John during Johns' conversation with this unknown desk officer.

The bottom line: If Officers Smith and Ochoa had just done their jobs to

begin with back in 2012; none of this would have happened. This incident was merely an extension of the 2012 Oasis Nightclub incident with Officers Smith and Ochoa.

<><><>

SEE ALSO: AMENDED COMPLAINT #2 / TABLE OF CONTENTS @

http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2017/02/amended-complaint-2-table-of-contents_6.html

1) DEMAND FOR CASE REMAND

http://likroper.com/DEMANDFORCASEREMAND1.wpd

and/or GO TO: DEMAND FOR CASE REMAND #2 @

http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2017/02/demand-for-case-remand-2.html

2) PREFACE

http://likroper.com/PREFACE1.wpd

3) AMENDED COMPLAINT #2

http://likroper.com/AMENDEDCOMPLAINT2A.wpd

4) ATTACHMENTS

http://likroper.com/ATTACHMENTS1.wpd

5) ATTACHED DOCUMENTS

(not included)

6) SECRET FILE

(classified information)

John is requesting a preliminary hearing regarding the subject matter in this complaint. Required reciprocal documentation is requested as well. Defendants have committed acts that constitute a chargeable offense and/or have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation before a government agency. Concern for what has occurred; as opposed to concern for what has been said; needs to be officially addressed -- as actions speak louder than words; and all words are legal under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

STRIKE THREE YOU'RE OUT!? > Beninger + Struble Familia + Amadeo Junior +

Olenak Familia + Manoukian + Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familia = Strike Three; You're Out!

1) Court documents show Mister Struble admitted to attacking John by initially corroborating Johns' account of the 1998 incident to Sunnyvale DPS Officer Discher; attempting to run over ducks right after strong local case law had been created placing a priority on the protection of these waterfowl right after a then recent incident at a Campbell, California car wash. Adding to this; ex-Sunnyvale DPS Officer is a child molesting freak who recently gave his own abused son a restraining order; and also failed to protect and serve John as required.

GO TO: EX-SUNNYVALE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (DPS) OFFICER MATTHEW BENINGER & SON ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/10/ex-police-officer-matthew-beninger.html

2) Mister Olenak admitted to attacking John at a 2006 "mob style sit down" administrative hearing in front of two billy club-carrying "Nazi" Santa Clara Police Officers and Judge Louis Amadeo, Junior (a hearing where John had $230 dollars extorted out of him; and Johns' Father was held against his will and tormented by the Olenak Familia right after this said "mob style sit down" trial.

GO TO: JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO JUNIOR @

http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/judge-louis-amadeo-junior.html

3) The Rebholtz/Paolinetti familias obstructed justice and/or conspired with Sunnyvale DPS and the Santa Clara Police Department to violate Johns' Unalienable (etc) Rights; slandering Johns' good reputation in the process with blatant lies and mischaracterization. Adding to this; apparently John is not the only individual questioning the actions of the 'Honorable' Judge Socrates Manoukian.

GO TO: THE HONORABLE SOCRATES MANOUKIAN @

http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/11/the-honorable-socrates-manoukian.html

All defendants have committed acts that constitute a chargeable offense and/or have engaged in fraud and/or willful misrepresentation before a government agency. Psychological testing is requested for all defendants who have exhibited psychopathic tendencies and/or who are a harm to themselves or others.

Note: After the said "mob sit down style" Administrative hearing with Louis Amadeo, Junior in the City of Santa Clara back in 2007; John found out that Judge Amadeo was actually hired by the City of Santa Clara to perform his services; meaning there was a MASSIVE conflict of interest where Judge Amadeo was actually hired to come up with judgements favorable to the City of Santa Clara. It should appear obvious that Mister Amadeo was not a true unbiased third party; and instead was hired to help avoid inevitable lawsuits caused by their crooked cops.

GO TO: ARE YOU BEING DELPHIED? @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/10/are-you-being-delphied.html

SEE ALSO: THANKS FOR NOTHING / PART II -- MOTION FOR EXPUNGEMENT AND/OR FACTUAL INNOCENCE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/06/thanks-for-nothing-part-ii-motion-for.html

NOTE: Amendment XIV / Section 1 -- All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. > GO TO: https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv

With Liberty Injustice for All? – "Today the skill and gamesmanship of lawyers, not the truth, often determine the outcome of a case. And we lawyers love it. All the tools are there to obscure and confound. The system's process of discovery and the exclusionary rule often work to keep vital information off-limits to jurors and make cases so convoluted and complex that only lawyers and judges understand them. The net effect has been to increase our need for lawyers, create more work for them, clog the courts and ensure that most cases never go to trial and are, instead, plea-bargained and compromised. All the while the clock is ticking, and the monster is being fed..."

"The sullying of American law has resulted in a fountain of money for law professionals while the common people, who are increasingly affected by lawyer-driven changes and an expensive, self-serving bureaucracy, are left confused and ill-served. Today, it is estimated that 70 percent of low-to-middle-income citizens can no longer afford the cost of justice in America.

"The once honorable profession of law now fully functions as a bottom-line business, driven by greed and the pursuit of power and wealth, even shaping the laws of the United States outside the elected Congress and state legislatures..."

GO TO: WITH LIBERTY INJUSTICE FOR ALL? @

http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2017/02/with-liberty-injustice-for-all.html

In July of 2014 John received a letter from the George Hills Company regarding an investigation initiated in response to Johns' various claims made against the City of Sunnyvale etc; no required reciprocal documentation regarding the outcome of this investigation was ever received as specified in the document. Paolinetti Familia moved out of the neighborhood in mid February 2014; and this could have very likely caused the commencement of the investigation.

GO TO: JULY 2014 INVESTIGATION OBSTRUCTED? @

http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2017/01/july-2014-investigation-obstructed.html

Note: Okay! It's now three years later George Hills Company...any time now...you do realize that you are required by law to respond; do you not George Hills Company?...or that false statements are illegal?...or that unkept promises are fraudulent and essentially amount to false statements?

A PATTERN OR PRACTICE OF DISCRIMINATION – "The courts have found a "pattern or practice" when the evidence establishes that the discriminatory actions were the defendant's regular practice, rather than an isolated instance. This does not mean that the Department has to prove that a defendant always discriminates or that a large number of people have been affected. A "pattern or practice" means that the defendant has a policy of discriminating, even if the policy is not always followed. The courts have held that the Attorney General has discretion to decide what constitutes an issue of "general public importance," and the courts will not second-guess that decision. Thus, the Department can bring suit even when a discriminatory act has occurred only once, if it affects a group of persons and the Department believes that the discrimination raises an issue of general public importance..."

A PATTERN OR PRACTICE OF DISCRIMINATION: @

http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/10/a-pattern-or-practice-of-discrimination.html

SEE ALSO: UNETHICAL, UNACCEPTABLE, EGREGIOUS, OVERARCHING, CONSPIRATORIAL, MULTIFARIOUS AND MALFEASANT ETC MISCONDUCT...

EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW?

<><><>

[Amended 2 March 2017]